CARA Science: CMBR Site Characterization: Background Information
(This is background information for the CMBR
site testing page.)
The Python Experiment
The Python telescope, in its configuration for the 1996-1997 season,
employs a dual feed 40 GHz HEMT based receiver. The
receiver has two corrugated feeds separated by 2.75° on the sky,
with separate RF chains, HEMT amplifiers, and backend signal processing.
The post-detector output is AC coupled with a cut-off frequency of 1 Hz,
and incorporates a low-pass anti-alias filter which attenuates the
signal at frequencies above 100 Hz. The RF signal is separated into
two frequency bands, centered at 39 GHz and 41.5 GHz with bandwidths
of approximately 2 GHz and 5 GHz, respectively. Data from the two bands
are combined for atmospheric analysis. The feeds are in the focal plane
of a 0.8 m off-axis paraboloidal mirror, resulting in two 1.1°
beams on the sky which are swept through 10° at constant elevation
at a rate of 5.1 Hz by a large vertical flat mirror. The two beams are
at the same elevation and their sweeps partially overlap on the sky.
Beam spillover is reflected to the sky by two sets of shields, one
set fixed to the tracking telescope, and a set of larger stationary
ground shields which also shield the telescope structure from the sun
and any local sources of interference. Data are taken for ~30 s
while sweeping and tracking a central position on the sky; the telescope
is then slewed to another position a few degrees away. Between 5 and 13
pointings are stored in one data file, representing 5 to 10 minutes
of observing time. Data were taken over 80 % of the period from early
December 1996 through early February 1997.
Data Analysis Technique
In order to differentiate atmospheric fluctuation power from
instrument noise, the covariance of the data from the two beams is taken
for the portion of each sweep in which their positions overlap on the
sky, approximately 6°. Atmospheric brightness fluctuations are
correlated between the two beams, while most of the instrument noise is
uncorrelated. Thus the signal-to-noise of the correlated fluctuation
power can be increased by averaging the covariance over many
sweeps on the sky, allowing the atmospheric brightness
fluctuation power to be estimated during stable periods when the system
is receiver noise limited. The mean covariance represents the mean
`snapshot' fluctuation power in the 6° sweep, regardless of the
number of sweeps that are subsequently averaged together.
Several instrumental effects are accounted for when estimating
the atmospheric brightness fluctuation power:
We determine the effect of the 60 Hz line noise filter and
stationary signal removal technique on the true atmospheric signal
by examining their effect on the data during periods when the data
are dominated by atmospheric fluctuations. We calculated that the
atmospheric power should be increased by 30% to compensate for the
combined effect of these filters and instrumental effects. There
is an additional correlated signal due to the stationary ground
shield and due to the CMB itself, which is not removed with these
techniques. Therefore, the quartiles which we report should be taken
as an upper limit of the true atmospheric signal.
- The fluctuation power is corrected for the effect of the
anti-alias filter roll-off and backend electronics delay.
- Correlated 60 Hz line noise is removed from the data.
- An offset dependent on the position of the sweeping mirror
is correlated between the two beams. This is removed by subtracting
the component of the signal that is constant on the sky over
Back to the CMBR
site testing page.